Papers › Context-Aware Mutual Learning for Blind Image Inpainting and Beyond

Context-Aware Mutual Learning for Blind Image Inpainting and Beyond

13 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.14439added by Syntology

Haoru Zhao, Yufeng Wang, Zhaorui Gu, Bing Zheng, Haiyong Zheng

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Blind image inpainting, aiming to recover contaminated images in the case of unknown masks, is a challenging task. Motivated by the perspective of human vision and knowledge, blind image inpainting can be decomposed into two stages: mask estimation and image inpainting based on the estimated mask. The two-stage idea exhibits evident advantages in enhancing inpainting quality and augmenting the generalization capability of unknown real-world contamination by explicitly employing the estimated mask for image inpainting compared to one-stage scheme. This two-stage idea has also been intuitively implemented. However, existing two-stage methods excessively emphasize the unilateral relationship of mask estimation to image inpainting, and may overlook the mutual relations between them. Specifically, mask estimation can provide more contextual semantics for image inpainting to strengthen the understanding of semantics, and image inpainting can offer more contextual details (e.g., textures and edges) for mask estimation to improve the learning of details. In this work, we propose a novel Context-Aware Mutual Learning (CAML) framework for blind image inpainting that joints mask estimation and image inpainting to mutually exploit contextual information. In the CAML framework, we design the Inpainting-Guided Context-Mutual (IGCM) learner to acquire the complementary contextual details from image inpainting for assisting mask estimation, and the Estimation-Guided Context-Mutual (EGCM) learner to strengthen the understanding of contextual semantics from mask estimation for assisting image inpainting. Ablation studies validate the efficacy of our CAML. Extensive experiments show that our CAML achieves state-of-the-art performance on both blind image inpainting and additional vision tasks, i.e., snow removal, shadow removal, and watermark removal, indicating its superiority.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from zhenglab/CAML. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.14439, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology

Syntology's extractor considered 1 leaderboard for this paper and did not place the paper on it: 1 refused by a rule. What is not shown.

Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections