Papers › Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Foundation Models for Liver Tumor Segmentation in CT
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Foundation Models for Liver Tumor Segmentation in CT
Ramtin Mojtahedi, Mohammad Hamghalam, Jacob J. Peoples, Richard K. G. Do, Amber L. Simpson
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
We evaluated parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) for liver tumor segmentation in abdominal CT of colorectal liver metastases. We compared Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), 4-bit Quantized LoRA (QLoRA), a convolutional adapter (Conv-Adapter), and our Directional Spectral Top-K adapter (DiSCo), training only adapters while freezing the SAM backbone. DiSCo derives spectral bases from singular value decomposition of row-normalized weights and learns rank-gated spectral coefficients, per-output magnitude offsets, and a spectral gain, with optional Top-K rank selection at inference and 0.14 M trainable parameters. We benchmarked five prompting regimes: no prompt, single-point, multi-point, and bounding boxes at intersection over union 0.50 and 0.75. Conv-Adapter and LoRA achieved the highest accuracy (overall Dice 0.793 and 0.792; single-point Dice 0.795 and 0.792; 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) 32 mm). QLoRA was close (overall Dice 0.766; single-point Dice 0.768; HD95 36.41 mm), with 0.91 M trainable parameters, 120 ms latency, and 4.9 GB peak memory. DiSCo achieved the highest Dice per million trainable parameters (4.66), with overall Dice 0.653, single-point Dice 0.698, and HD95 49.53 mm. These results show an accuracy-efficiency trade-off and support PEFT for liver tumor segmentation with reduced adaptation costs when compute and labeled data are limited. Code: https://github.com/Ramtin-Mojtahedi/PEFT-SAM-Liver-CT
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.14106")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Ramtin-Mojtahedi/PEFT-SAM-Liver-CT. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
d457684fd84f4248 · report
17c1b74290197e01 · report
615b6e1dbca7e8b6 · report
0bdf58a747e585c4 · report
9842c9739e5247c9 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.14106, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections