Papers › GEAR: From Dynamic Encoding to Dynamic Activation in Social Trajectory Prediction

GEAR: From Dynamic Encoding to Dynamic Activation in Social Trajectory Prediction

12 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.13778added by Syntology

Jiaheng Chen, Jiaxing Li, Leixia Wang, Jianan Ju, Tinghe Zhang

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Human trajectory prediction requires modeling both individual motion patterns and social interactions among agents. Existing methods have made substantial progress by using attention mechanisms, graph structures, and temporal encoders to capture dynamic social context. However, most of them primarily focus on how social information is encoded, while paying less explicit attention to how the encoded social context should take effect during future trajectory generation. In this paper, we argue that dynamic social encoding does not necessarily imply dynamic social activation. The same interaction context may require different activation strengths across future horizons and scene densities: social cues should be strengthened when interaction evidence is strong, but suppressed when they are weak or noisy. To address this issue, we propose GEAR, a generation-aware bias activation model for human trajectory prediction. Built upon a bias-decomposed trajectory generation formulation, GEAR dynamically activates the individual-motion and social-resonance bias terms at each future step before final trajectory composition. This allows the model to explicitly control when and how strongly individual and social bias components participate in generation. Experiments on ETH-UCY, SDD, and NBA show that GEAR consistently improves the resonance-based baseline and achieves competitive state-of-the-art performance. Further analyses of activation patterns and density-grouped errors validate the importance of calibrating encoded social context during trajectory generation. Our code is available at https://github.com/11isnotavailable/GEAR.git.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 11isnotavailable/GEAR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.13778, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology

Syntology's extractor considered 1 leaderboard for this paper and did not place the paper on it: 1 refused by a rule. What is not shown.

Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections