Papers › ZGCM-1: A Fully Open and Extremely Efficient Foundation Model for Math and Agentic Search

ZGCM-1: A Fully Open and Extremely Efficient Foundation Model for Math and Agentic Search

11 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.13356added by Syntology

Jiyan He, Guang Liang, Hao Liu, Haoxiang Guan, Jinbo Sun, Junyi Guo, Wenjun Feng, Yantai Xie, Yifei Shen, Bin Shao, Chuyang Wei, Kai Chen, Kexin Zhou, Minghang Zhu, Shuxin Zheng, Tie-Yan Liu, Taine Zhao, Wenhui Zhu, Xueyin Xu, Xiaoqing Zhang, Yatao Li, Yuxuan Ren

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

In this work, we present ZGCM-1, a fully open 7B dense foundation model trained from scratch with extreme data, system, and algorithmic efficiency. ZGCM-1 is founded on a core premise: compact models cannot passively memorize the open web, but can overcome parametric capacity limits by coupling deliberate internal thinking with active external tool use. To support this paradigm across a 256K context, we develop an end-to-end, high-efficiency open training recipe: Architecture & System Co-design: interleaved gated sliding-window and full attention, and a stable FP8 Muon optimizer; Progressive Curriculum & MDP Mid-Training: context scaling across 16K, 64K, and 256K, and the reformulation of interaction traces into Markov Decision Processes. Furthermore, we establish an AI-native R&D workflow where agent swarms autonomously manage cluster operations, data curation, and rapid diagnostic evaluation. Extensive evaluations show that ZGCM-1-7B is competitive across 7B model family on general benchmarks. On several challenging mathematical reasoning and agentic search suites, it remains competitive with frontier models orders of magnitude larger, such as Qwen3-235B-A22B and GLM-5.1. We also show that our pre-training design offers a ~4.2x efficiency improvement in 16K pre-training time-to-loss. Across the full development lifecycle, we distill eight actionable empirical findings-spanning architectural scaling, SFT quality pruning, long-context generalization, and agentic co-training dynamics. To facilitate community research, we open-source model weights from the pre-training, mid-training, and post-training stages, intermediate checkpoints, training code, per-stage data and data recipes, and W&B logs.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.13356")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 9 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

zgcagi/ZGCM-1 found in paper text by SyntologyMIT report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

9unverified

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from zgcagi/ZGCM-1. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

balance_work_units zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/training.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · d2e1a605b76202c5 · report
build_manifest zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/common/manifest.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 0befc1d739b05c81 · report
deterministic_shuffle_key zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/training.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · f83df2f15316325a · report
file_sha256 zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/common/manifest.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · c730ac1fded39006 · report
hamming_distance zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/dedup.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 74690db5ac71bd4d · report
open_text zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/io.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · e5e2136c3fe809e5 · report
simhash64 zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/dedup.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 4e21bc5d96397adf · report
stable_partition zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/training.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 4957218c8fde1125 · report
write_jsonl zgcagi/ZGCM-1/data-process/src/zgcm_data_pipeline/io.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · c7dedc6d115b342d · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.13356, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections