Papers › RA-SOD: Reliability-Aware RGB-T Salient Object Detection under Modality Degradation

RA-SOD: Reliability-Aware RGB-T Salient Object Detection under Modality Degradation

11 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.12622added by Syntology

Hongbo Gao, Zhengyu Li, Xueru Nie, Dihao Zhu, Lijun Zhao, Yunke Wang, Chang Xu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

RGB-Thermal (RGB-T) salient object detection leverages complementary cues from visible and thermal modalities to improve robustness in challenging environments. However, in real-world scenarios, the reliability of each modality is inherently unstable: RGB images degrade under low illumination, motion blur, and noise, while thermal imagery often suffers from contrast compression and sensor artifacts. Such degradation introduces unreliable perceptual evidence that can mislead cross-modal fusion and significantly deteriorate detection performance. To address this challenge, we propose RA-SOD, a reliability-aware RGB-T salient object detection framework that explicitly models modality reliability and integrates it into feature learning and cross-modal fusion. First, we introduce a reliability-conditioned representation that adaptively compensates degraded modality features while preserving structural cues. Second, an uncertainty-guided dual-stream refinement strategy progressively corrects cross-modal representations while suppressing unreliable evidence. Finally, we propose a pixel-wise modality competition mechanism that dynamically selects modality cues according to spatial reliability for fine-grained fusion. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks (VT821, VT1000, VT5000, and VT-IMAG) demonstrate that RA-SOD achieves state-of-the-art performance and exhibits strong robustness under severe modality degradation. Code and models are available at https://github.com/zaoxienian/RA-SOD.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from zaoxienian/RA-SOD. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.12622, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections