Papers › RoES: Rotational Equivariant Selective-frequency Fusion for Multimodal Images

RoES: Rotational Equivariant Selective-frequency Fusion for Multimodal Images

11 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.12497added by Syntology

Jiabao Wang, Wenjian Liu, Yaoming Cai, Gengyu Zhang, Boyan Zhao, Zijia Zhang, Yao Ding, Xiaobo Liu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Infrared-visible image fusion facilitates robust multimodal perception by integrating complementary textural nuances from visible sensors with thermal signatures from infrared systems. Due to the task's inherently ill-posed nature, existing methods heavily rely on structural priors but typically enforce rotation equivariance uniformly across all features. Such a holistic approach overlooks a critical distinction where low-frequency shared structures strictly adhere to equivariant constraints while high-frequency modality-specific details require greater flexibility to preserve unique information. To bridge this gap, we propose RoES, a Rotational Equivariant Selective-frequency fusion network. Instead of employing static decomposition, we introduce a trainable rotation-enhanced updater/predictor module to dynamically decouple low- and high-frequency components. The resulting representations are then processed through a dual-branch fusion module tailored for spectral consistency. Specifically, a rotation-equivariant Mamba is employed to capture long-range structural dependencies in the low-frequency domain, while a polar spectral attention-based Dual-Fourier block refines high-frequency details under explicit low-frequency guidance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RoES consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance in both fusion quality and downstream object detection, establishing a robust solution for multimodal fusion by reconciling frequency-selective features with equivariant constraints. The source code is available at https://github.com/BryceLosky/RoES-Fusion.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from BryceLosky/RoES-Fusion. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.12497, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections