Papers › 3D Digital Twin Visualization of Multiclass GRF-Based Gait Disorder Classification
3D Digital Twin Visualization of Multiclass GRF-Based Gait Disorder Classification
Nayoung Son, Minwoo Shin
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Automated gait analysis requires accurate classification and interpretable outputs. We propose an integrated framework for classifying healthy gait and multiple musculoskeletal impairment groups using bilateral ground reaction force (GRF) and center-of-pressure (COP) signals. The signals were normalized over the stance phase and standardized using training-set statistics. The model achieved a validation accuracy of 99.00\% and a test accuracy of 90.07\% under a session-level split. Class-specific ε-LRP identified positive and negative contributions across both sides, multiple signal components, and different stance phases. Separately, the processed GRF signals and model predictions were synchronized within a Blender-based 3D visualization, enabling sample-level inspection of gait trials and classification results. The proposed framework integrates classification, explainability, and 3D visualization to improve model transparency. The source code is available in the following repository: https://github.com/nyoico/grf-gait-3d-visualization.git
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.12442")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 9 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 9 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 9 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
9 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 9 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 9 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from nyoico/grf-gait-3d-visualization. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
46c82b084ea22203 · report
797646eb38a15152 · report
130001312930181f · report
53871dc240c4db36 · report
b4016d97315fadbe · report
5c311129675cd5e8 · report
0392f118f5bd612d · report
5421554b3fa1e7b0 · report
2c7057f4c3b5922d · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.12442, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections