Papers › Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with...

Revisiting Multi-Object Tracking Baselines: Hyperparameter Optimization with Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search

10 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.12261added by Syntology

Momir Adžemović

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Multi-object tracking (MOT) is dominated by the tracking-by-detection paradigm, whose methods typically rely on a small set of hyperparameters that are conventionally chosen by hand. Tuning them requires repeated expert-guided experimentation, while the procedures used to select reported values are often not systematically evaluated or fully documented. Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) automates this process, yet it remains rarely used in MOT, and existing studies applying HPO to MOT predate modern deep-detector-based trackers and HOTA evaluation. We systematically apply HPO across two datasets and four tracking-by-detection methods. We also propose Multi-Fidelity Greedy Coordinate Search (MFGCS), which optimizes one hyperparameter at a time by first evaluating candidate values on a small subset of scenes and re-evaluating only promising candidates on the full dataset. Across all eight tracker-dataset combinations, the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) and MFGCS outperform both our hand-tuned configurations and the corresponding published results, with improvements of up to 4.38 and 16.05 HOTA points, respectively. MFGCS also reaches a predefined HOTA target faster than TPE in seven of the eight combinations. Within each tracker-dataset pair, all optimizers share the same search space and evaluation pipeline, isolating the effect of the search strategy. We release the code and tuned configurations to enable future work to compare against systematically optimized rather than default or manually tuned baselines.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Robotmurlock/Motrack. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.12261, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections