Papers › The 2026 PNPL Competition: Word Classification and Efficient Cross-Subject...
The 2026 PNPL Competition: Word Classification and Efficient Cross-Subject Generalisation in LibriBrain100
Francesco Mantegna, Gereon Elvers, Dulhan Jayalath, Gilad Landau, Tasha Kim, Miran Özdogan, Luisa Kurth, Teyun Kwon, SungJun Cho, Benjamin Ballyk, Alex Fung, Anna Greer, Pratik Somaiya, Christian Herff, Yorguin Mantilla Ramos, Hamza Abdelhedi, Karim Jerbi, Greg Farquhar, Brendan Shillingford, Mark Woolrich, Oiwi Parker Jones
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
The ambition of the 2025 PNPL competition (Landau et al., 2025) was to launch a multi-year curriculum for non-invasive speech decoding. Designed to progress from foundational tasks toward the linguistic complexity required for a practical brain-computer interface (BCI), it set the stage with speech detection and phoneme classification tasks. Winning submissions reached F1-macro scores of 95.6% and 73.6% on the respective tasks (Elvers et al., 2026), highly significant advances. This success was built on the LibriBrain dataset (Özdogan et al., 2025), the largest within-subject MEG dataset recorded at the time with ∼50 hours of data for one subject. However, while within-subject scale drives strong decoding performance, a practical BCI must generalise to new users from minutes of data, not hours. The 2026 PNPL competition responds to this challenge with LibriBrain100 (Mantegna et al., 2026), an extended LibriBrain dataset with 32 additional subjects (∼40 minutes each) plus even more within-subject data (∼80 hours). Advancing the curriculum of tasks to focus on word classification, two complementary tracks are presented in this competition: the Deep track targets within-subject word classification at scale, aiming at the best possible performance; the Broad track targets cross-subject generalisation, progressively reducing the amount of subject-specific fine-tuning data from ∼40 to ∼20 to ∼10 minutes, a duration that falls within a clinically feasible range and brings us a step closer to a non-invasive BCI capable of restoring communication to people living with profound paralysis.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.03231")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 12 have no recorded run.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 12 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from neural-processing-lab/pnpl. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
11aae0068688fbdc · report
73b52c215445096c · report
3d89991b0773e674 · report
f10d9c934ae6080e · report
a1173f114e4e3458 · report
5a55c7cc4b984e7e · report
a076b2cf953c5553 · report
6cc1620ae9106f3b · report
8c850239839d0eba · report
53f92a1234f75a04 · report
b065b36b1c21ea8f · report
5b876d3a37c6e4dc · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.03231, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections