Papers › Learning to Attract and Repel: Dual Quality Margin Learning for Face Recognition (DQM-Face)
Learning to Attract and Repel: Dual Quality Margin Learning for Face Recognition (DQM-Face)
El Ouanas Belabbaci, Bhavesh Wani, Philipp Terhörst
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Face recognition in unconstrained environments remains highly challenging due to diverse and extreme variations encountered in real-world scenarios. To mitigate these effects, existing margin-based approaches model sample quality through feature magnitude. However, magnitude-based modeling alone is susceptible to identity-agnostic noise, which can degrade the reliability and discriminative power of learned representations. In this paper, we propose Dual Quality Margin Learning for Face Recognition (DQM-Face), a novel framework that enables refined attraction and repulsion dynamics during representation learning. Our approach unifies conventional magnitude-based quality estimation with a newly introduced semantic quality learning mechanism, realized via squeeze-and-excitation semantic attention. By jointly leveraging magnitude and semantic cues, we construct enhanced quality-aware margins that adaptively strengthen intra-class compactness through improved attraction during learning. To further enhance inter-class discrimination, we introduce a repulsion margin formulation that explicitly enlarges inter-class separation. The unified integration of semantic quality modeling with dual attraction-repulsion margin optimization results in a more structured and discriminative feature geometry. Extensive experiments on multiple challenging benchmarks demonstrate that DQM-Face consistently outperforms state-of-the-art face recognition methods. Moreover, we show that the quality learned for margin optimization is highly effective for face image quality assessment within the proposed framework, demonstrating that the learned quality signal is intrinsically aligned with the recognition objective. The code is publicly available: https://github.com/RAIB-group/DQM-Face
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2609.02644")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 11 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from RAIB-group/DQM-Face. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
158bf4c3a5f11f04 · report
29df79c9fdb0cee8 · report
2da848988b60d9cc · report
5d4f053df0d470c0 · report
0a65872d0d3a6ae9 · report
4526e3cb89fcc64d · report
4d9c7539a3cd23a8 · report
ba27305324d07ed1 · report
000c54655537fe64 · report
e60885cdbeb940b6 · report
897480715a729925 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.02644, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology
Syntology's extractor considered 6 leaderboards for this paper and placed the paper on none of them: 1 rejected by the independent check; 5 refused by a rule. What is not shown.
Syntology has checked 6,885 of the 9,623 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections