Papers › T2LSC-Bench: Benchmarking Localized Semantic Control in Text-to-Image Generation

T2LSC-Bench: Benchmarking Localized Semantic Control in Text-to-Image Generation

2 Sep 2026arXiv:2609.02255added by Syntology

Yan Wang, Xinyi Hou, Weiguo Lin, Junjun Si, Siwei Ma

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Recent text-to-image models have become increasingly capable of rendering explicit text, but reliable localized text control requires more than generating the correct string. In applications such as product labeling, signage, and interface design, target text should be rendered within a designated text-bearing region without altering the predefined subject identity or surrounding scene semantics. We refer to violations of this requirement as target-text-associated semantic leakage, in which target-text semantics are expressed through non-textual visual content beyond the designated anchor. Existing visual-text benchmarks primarily evaluate readability, spelling accuracy, and layout, leaving this form of semantic leakage largely unexamined. We introduce T2LSC-Bench, a controlled diagnostic benchmark comprising 50 seed subjects and 1,200 prompt cases per model, yielding 7,160 evaluated images across six models. Its factorized design varies semantic relation, scene openness, prompt mode, and language. A dual-branch protocol combines OCR-VLM text verification with structured VLM semantic judgments to measure Text-at-Anchor Accuracy (TAA), Semantic Subject Preservation (SSP), Semantic Leakage Rate (SLR), and Conditional Semantic Leakage Rate (cSLR). Under stress-test conditions, SLR increases from 1.2% to 18.1% and cSLR from 1.3% to 18.2%, whereas TAA decreases only from 91.4% to 90.9%. Anti-leakage prompting reduces SLR from 16.6% to 8.4% without degrading rendering accuracy. Human validation on 420 images shows strong agreement between automatic and adjudicated annotations. These results show that accurate text rendering does not guarantee local containment of target-text semantics.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

15 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 15 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 15 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from LLMSecResearch/T2LSC-Bench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2609.02255, was issued in September 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections