Papers › Language-Informed Flow Matching for Trend-Guided Structure-Based 3D Molecular Generation

Language-Informed Flow Matching for Trend-Guided Structure-Based 3D Molecular Generation

31 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.31009added by Syntology

Tianyu Gao, Zhikai Su, Jiashu Li, Wenjun Gao, Zichuan Ying, Zhe Zhao, Fei Zhang, Ye Wei

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Structure-based drug design (SBDD) requires ligands that satisfy both 3D target affinity and 1D chemical validity. Existing controllable generation methods often rely on task-specific fine-tuning or externally imposed sampling-time guidance, adding cost and potentially conflicting with evolving 3D geometric constraints. We propose LiFT, a language-informed cross-modal framework built on Flow Matching for trend-guided 3D molecular generation across both de novo design and scaffold hopping. LiFT uses a "Sense-Evolve-Assemble" agent to generate target-aware SMILES as intermediate chemical conditions, from which a pre-trained chemical foundation model extracts continuous semantic priors. These priors are integrated into geometric generation through a lightweight semantic projector with zero-initialized adaptive normalization for stable cross-modal conditioning. We further introduce a Self-Conditioned Decoupled Router (SCDR), which modulates the velocity field according to intermediate structural states during ODE integration. Experiments on Cross-Docked2020 show that LiFT achieves competitive distribution matching while improving medicinal chemistry metrics and maintaining competitive structural validity under task-steering settings without additional generator fine-tuning. Our results suggest that language-derived chemical priors provide effective trend-level guidance for 3D molecular generation. Code and released artifacts are available at https://github.com/kasurl/LiFT.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.31009")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

kasurl/LiFT found in paper text by SyntologyMIT report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from kasurl/LiFT. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

aggregate_metrics kasurl/LiFT/src/generate.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 77ddb1afea6e25ff · report
combine kasurl/LiFT/src/sample_and_evaluate.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · 5ce65a91a0f78c2c · report
get_sample_resume_state kasurl/LiFT/src/sample_and_evaluate.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · f6be95fd4fc7ba57 · report
path_to_str kasurl/LiFT/src/sample_and_evaluate.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · a9b68cec61c96e07 · report
reverse_tensor kasurl/LiFT/src/utils.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified MIT (permissive) · f69f2334c7ce9784 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.31009, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections