Papers › Agentic Autoresearch for Cell-Edge Power Control: Radically Redefining the Researcher's Role

Agentic Autoresearch for Cell-Edge Power Control: Radically Redefining the Researcher's Role

26 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.26093added by Syntology

Ahmad Khan, Akram Bin Sediq, Sara Azadegi Naeini, Raviraj S. Adve

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Designing machine learning algorithms for wireless resource management is labour-intensive: the architecture, the loss function and the training recipe are all specified by hand. We demonstrate that this design layer can be surrendered to an autonomous agent in its entirety. We adopt the autoresearch protocol, in which an AI coding agent edits a training script, runs a fixed-budget experiment, and retains or discards the change according to a single immutable metric. We grant the agent authority over the architecture family, the input representation, the output parameterization, the loss function and the task-sampling law, and set it a target chosen for its difficulty: sum-least-percentile-rate power control across a multicell network. The formulation targets cell-edge throughput and is non-convex, non-smooth and strongly NP-hard away from its max-min vertex. Safeguards render the results trustworthy: a hash-pinned evaluator, an enforced inference contract and a pre-registered falsifier per experiment. In eighty-one unattended experiments over twenty-six hours, the agent reached 99.5% of a converged minorization-maximization reference in one fixed-cost inference pass, at roughly 600× lower inference cost, closing 94% of the gap from its first working architecture, with one parameter set serving every network size and percentile target. It recovered provable structure rather than tuned constants: the output parameterization it discovered reproduces the exact max-min-optimal allocation at the minimum percentile, for every value of the trained weights.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from akhan-ericsson/autoresearch-percentile-optimization. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.26093, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections