Papers › A Hierarchical Synergistic Deep Learning Framework Integrating Composition, Structure,...
A Hierarchical Synergistic Deep Learning Framework Integrating Composition, Structure, and Ionic Transport for Solid-State Electrolyte Discovery
Hongwei Du, Dingyang Lv, Baole Wei, Yongheng Li, Feng Yu, Ziheng Lu, Siqi Shi, Hong Wang
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Inorganic solid-state electrolytes must combine high room-temperature ionic conductivity, a wide electrochemical window, excellent electronic insulation, and favorable mechanical compliance. Single models struggle to support reliable multi-objective screening across vast chemical spaces because of training-data distribution mismatch, cross-property dataset heterogeneity, and scarce kinetic transport data. To overcome these limitations, we develop a hierarchical synergistic deep-learning framework that sequentially coordinates efficiency, accuracy, and reliability through four complementary modules. The in-house-developed L-G-DCNN and a multi-fidelity implementation built on DenseGNN serve as compositional and structural experts for thermodynamic coarse screening and multi-property evaluation, respectively; MatterSim and system-specific DeePMD models provide transport pre-assessment and kinetic validation. Systematic benchmarks show that each module outperforms mainstream counterparts in its task, while retrospective validation establishes dual closed-loop verification of module-level accuracy and end-to-end workflow reliability. Applied to 30,364,908 Alex/ICSD-derived candidates, the framework identifies 97 high-performance candidates with room-temperature ionic conductivities of 0.109--59.0 mS/cm, including 94 halides, one borohydride, and two oxides. Consistency with independent experimental data confirms that 76 of the 94 halides fall within reported high-conductivity structural regions. Analysis reveals that Li⁺ jump-network connectivity, rather than the number of geometric Li sites, is the core determinant of room-temperature ionic conductivity. Li-defect engineering effectively enhances oxide transport, whereas the inherent rigidity of the O²⁻ framework suggests a potential upper limit on oxide electrolyte performance.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.25592")
Code
Syntology Ran 16 of 17 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 16 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 17 samples from 1 repository, 16 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
17 samples harvested; 16 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 17 of the 17 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from dhw059/MatCascade. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
bb56c41ae2944cdf · report
669c08df9a64c263 · report
663ba61de150b7bd · report
436604438c366c1d · report
2df3016769866c49 · report
dfcff6ba657d393f · report
d295d039209aaa36 · report
79ab92c7c8b80cb4 · report
4b39fdcf42b54875 · report
eb322e9b3724001f · report
913209ed284d52d4 · report
753789054089e844 · report
8f6b001a42f48b78 · report
61f1bbb17e56f317 · report
04cb8aca0c89eef4 · report
44cd6850d7193f9e · report
f8e98d8e5e1e75c1 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.25592, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections