Papers › Conditional GraphGANFed: Optimizing Graph-Structured Molecule Generation in Federated...
Conditional GraphGANFed: Optimizing Graph-Structured Molecule Generation in Federated Generative Adversarial Networks
Daniel Manu, Abee Alazzwi
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have garnered considerable attention in molecular discovery for their ability to generate novel and high-quality molecules. To efficiently train a GAN model while preserving data privacy, GraphGANFed has been proposed to incorporate federated learning and graph convolutional networks into GAN. Yet, GraphGANFed cannot produce synthetic molecules that only optimize a user-defined metric(s) to facilitate the new drug discovery process. To address this issue, we introduce a novel extension to GraphGANFed, namely conditional GraphGANFed (cGraphGANFed), by incorporating the critic network to assess generated molecules using user-defined metric(s). The evaluation results from both the critic network and discriminator are integrated into the loss function of the generator, guiding it to generate novel molecules that maintain similar chemical properties to real ones while optimizing user-defined metrics. Extensive simulations are conducted in two scenarios. First, cGraphGANFed endeavors to optimize all seven commonly used metrics, and the results show that cGraphGANFed significantly outperforms GraphGANFed in Validity and LogP, with a slight advantage in QED, across different settings. Second, cGraphGANFed focuses solely on optimizing QED, and the results show that the synthetic molecules produced by cGraphGANFed can achieve more than 10% improvement in QED than GraphGANFed. Also, the results demonstrate cGraphGANFed has enhanced resilience against mode collapses and performance reduction caused by non-IID data.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.24610")
Code
Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from danielmanu93/Conditional-GraphGANFed. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
ab2485d028020739 · report
0eb9080e5f758c2f · report
77fa6af6e56bad0a · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.24610, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections