Papers › Taming foundation model with invariance-oriented pre-training for broad-spectrum EEG...
Taming foundation model with invariance-oriented pre-training for broad-spectrum EEG analysis across signal-level, brain-state, and brain-health tasks
Yulong Dou, Han Wu, Guo Chen, Fangmao Ju, Zhiming Cui, Dinggang Shen
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a widely used window into human brain function, but most EEG models remain tied to a one-dataset-one-model supervised paradigm. Recent EEG foundation models offer a route toward reusable representations, but most remain reconstruction-centered, assuming that EEG content predictable from local context is necessarily transferable neural information. Here we present INCEPT, an invariance-oriented EEG foundation model trained on over 11,000 hours of unlabelled clinical EEG. Rather than prioritizing signal recovery alone, INCEPT learns representation-level stability across correlated EEG observations, separating stable neural structure and essential subject-sensitive information from the nuisance variability that dominates scalp recordings while preserving subject-, state- and condition-discriminative information. We evaluate INCEPT on a broad-spectrum benchmark of ten datasets spanning three levels of post-acquisition EEG analysis: signal-level assessment, brain-state decoding, and brain-health evaluation. INCEPT ranks first among recent EEG foundation models on 26 of 30 linear-probing metrics and 24 of 30 fine-tuning metrics, and also surpasses strong task-specific specialist encoders across diverse downstream settings. Objective ablations and representation analyses further show that invariance-oriented pre-training improves transfer and organizes subject-sensitive neural representations beyond reconstruction alone. These results establish invariance learning as a promising principle for building reusable EEG foundation models.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.24597")
Code
Syntology Ran 17 of 25 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 14 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 25 samples from 4 repositories, 17 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
25 samples harvested; 17 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 10 of the 25 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
c6263e54c9b86e6d · report
ae0bc09e60a507a7 · report
208067a8a78f8511 · report
fea3ed5bbd32f75c · report
2dcd0e47512ab0d7 · report
e040d2abd0c95569 · report
6e10551ad32d731d · report
7c0d85643eabcc08 · report
e2d66913214dd8a8 · report
eb1aca90c956ed92 · report
2647ee32c29bcf93 · report
894c9f76db638d83 · report
e107d490daeb5f52 · report
74002c07fb43a2eb · report
a465028f6f0c4948 · report
4ed0c3453d83c7cf · report
3066e6494c4e39d6 · report
677385314c813687 · report
3ebdadbf41d1d55c · report
d24149f813f13a50 · report
cfb80bee310f453e · report
88b825b785fb689d · report
9d2c22dbef7595bf · report
4edaaa3872a51794 · report
6088673e8ec9c50c · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.24597, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections