Papers › Validation of HRV Studio: A Transparent and Quality-Control-Aware Platform for Heart...
Validation of HRV Studio: A Transparent and Quality-Control-Aware Platform for Heart Rate Variability Analysis
Cyrus Mexon Evrard Djindot, Faliang Liu, Sylvain Laborde, Yinjia Zhang, Jessie Chen, Ming Li, Congrong Wang, Weixiong Rao, Qinpei Zhao
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Reproducibility of heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is limited by differences in preprocessing and computational conventions across software platforms. We developed HRV Studio, an open-source PyQt6-based desktop application integrating transparent HRV analysis with automated quality-control (QC) diagnostics. Validation included large-scale agreement with NeuroKit2, targeted Kubios benchmarking, spectral-method comparison, synthetic perturbation testing, recording-duration sensitivity analysis, and arrhythmia-focused QC stress testing. HRV Studio showed near-identical agreement for the widely used time-domain indices RMSSD and SDNN under matched conditions. In the primary five-minute NeuroKit2 comparison, frequency-domain median relative errors were 1.35% for LF, 0.18% for HF, and 1.41% for LF/HF, while VLF remained more convention-sensitive (37.79%). Nonlinear Poincaré indices also demonstrated high consistency. Sequence-harmonized Kubios benchmarking confirmed near-identical agreement for time-domain and nonlinear indices and strong agreement for most frequency-domain measures. Extended ten-minute analyses reproduced the same overall pattern with lower disagreement for some convention-sensitive spectral outputs. Synthetic and arrhythmia stress tests maintained 100% numerical stability while consistently triggering QC warnings. Overall, HRV Studio provides a transparent and reproducible platform for HRV research, with strong cross-platform consistency when NN sequences, preprocessing, and analytical conventions are harmonized. Stress-test results indicate computational robustness rather than clinical validation.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.24241")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 13 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 13 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
13 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 13 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from CyrusMexon/HRV-Analysis_TJU. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
a2439cc7b249bbbd · report
b8d6da0475c2b345 · report
20fe50c1c7259788 · report
4a7722f1c3e2edc2 · report
a896d10a5a3c3ee2 · report
e58e35f415225fa3 · report
a6d12f416d649c62 · report
69143fbab75ae2b1 · report
72a890d3ff275ad3 · report
a10da5a325505b75 · report
e6d04e4071ff6181 · report
78d28243f848fd63 · report
600dd6bbdcd270ba · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.24241, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections