Papers › A Feature-Major Codebook for Memory-Efficient Sparse-Binary Self-Organizing Maps:...
A Feature-Major Codebook for Memory-Efficient Sparse-Binary Self-Organizing Maps: Scaling a MEDLINE Atlas to 1.05 Million Neurons on a Single Consumer GPU
Andrew James Amos
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
A self-organising map turns a large corpus into a browsable two-dimensional atlas, but building one at MEDLINE scale has been impractical: the best-matching-unit (BMU) search that dominates training is bound by the bandwidth needed to read the codebook every epoch. I show that this bottleneck is largely an artefact of codebook layout. Storing it feature-major with each feature's weights contiguous, W[v.M+i], recasts the search as a tiled sparse-dense product in which every loaded weight column is reused across a tile of samples. Varying only the layout, with implementation, precision and update rule held fixed, accelerates the BMU search by 4.5-8.5x. Because an exact-argmin BMU is invariant to how the codebook is stored, this gain costs nothing: held-out quantisation error agrees with a cuSPARSE baseline to within 0.5% at every map size. Against that baseline the advantage is a crossover rather than a constant: cuSPARSE.SOM is faster at small maps, SparseBin.SOM is 1.5x faster at 128x128 and 2.6x at 256x256, and at 512x512 it is the only one that runs at all on 24 GB. Paired with a radius-independent box-blur update and a convergence-based stopping rule, it trains a converged map over 29.9 million MEDLINE articles in about 72 s at 64x64 on one 24 GB GPU, and accommodates 262,144 neurons (512x512 edges) where every alternative algorithm I tested exceeds memory constraints. On a 141 GB H200 it reaches 1,048,576 neurons (1024x1024 edges) - to my knowledge the largest self-organising map yet reported. Held-out error follows a smooth power law with no elbow across three decades of map size, so the limit on resolution is compute rather than any breakpoint in the data. At matched work the design is ~82x faster than MedSOM, the CUDA implementation behind our earlier MEDLINE atlases and, at 128x128, 621x faster than the best available multicore-CPU library.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.24067")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 11 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 5 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 11 samples from 2 repositories, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
5d6e345c4ee5f54e · report
e6f4544f4d434209 · report
ee1ae50202292a50 · report
7b16c59a7518bdd5 · report
9ed2c9dc37848cb2 · report
6d08eef61ed652a2 · report
cd5839913a33398d · report
2dc721ebdb521add · report
4ab494984150152a · report
ddbf04f49dd7f3b6 · report
f5a7bc3b3f0e946f · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.24067, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections