Papers › Model-Consistent Byzantine-Resilient Decentralized Federated Learning for...
Model-Consistent Byzantine-Resilient Decentralized Federated Learning for Collaborative Missions
Yue Li, Sudip Bhujel, Cameron Lira, Ning Wang, Yang Xiao
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Decentralized federated learning (DFL) is a promising paradigm for autonomous nodes to collaboratively train AI models without relying on a central server. However, existing DFL solutions do not guarantee global model consistency, a critical requirement for collaborative mission-critical scenarios where model divergence undermines decision uniformity and safety. This lack of consistency also amplifies vulnerability to Byzantine adversaries, who exploit the decentralized network topology and weak synchrony to perform equivocation and model poisoning attacks against individual victims. This paper introduces DFL-C, a novel Byzantine-resilient DFL architecture that enables decentralized nodes to perform collaborative training with global model consistency. At its core, DFL-C integrates an asynchronous common subset (ACS) consensus protocol into the DFL workflow to ensure all nodes aggregate a uniform set of model updates to establish global model consistency, despite individual Byzantine equivocation. DFL-C further implements a dual-domain trust scoring mechanism to provide resilience against data-domain Byzantine manipulations including model poisoning attacks. This mechanism complements the consensus protocol, significantly reducing the latter's runtime. Our experimental results demonstrate that DFL-C maintains model accuracy while achieving global model consistency under Byzantine behaviors with moderate consensus overhead. Notably, when compared with the state-of-the-art DFL solution BALANCE (Fang et al.) that does not provide model consistency, DFL-C achieves better model accuracy against untargeted model poisoning attacks and comparable resilience against backdoor attacks, with the advantage widened under non-IID scenarios.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.22552")
Code
Syntology Ran 3 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 3 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from yli568/DFL-C. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
98ae285eede44514 · report
26a1800c0d45baeb · report
471e28c7cb75f9d0 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.22552, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections