Papers › Neuro-Geospatial Modelling of EEG Affective States Using Literature-Informed...

Neuro-Geospatial Modelling of EEG Affective States Using Literature-Informed Environmental Context

21 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.20807added by Syntology

Utsav Poudel, Jagannath Aryal, Subramaniyaswamy Vairavasundaram

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Environmental exposures such as air pollution and greenness have been associated with affective and cognitive outcomes, but EEG and environmental datasets are rarely jointly georeferenced. We investigate whether literature-informed environmental priors can serve as an auxiliary geospatial modality for EEG-based affective-state classification when individual-level exposure data are unavailable. We combine 30-channel EEG from the EAV benchmark (42 participants, aged 20-30 years) with environmental representations derived from OpenAQ, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-5P, and OpenStreetMap data for Astana. A dual-tower architecture combines EEG-Conformer representations with a graph-based environmental encoder. Because the datasets are not co-registered, environmental context is treated as a literature-informed prior rather than measured exposure. Subject-level repeated splits, permutation and label-shuffling controls, dose-response reversal, and domain-shift experiments distinguish architecture-level gains from prior-dependent gains. The multimodal model achieves 76.2% accuracy versus 67.4% for EEG alone. Controls disrupting environmental-label structure retain part of this gain, indicating that the improvement is not attributable solely to environmental information. Replacing the Astana environmental distribution with an independently modeled Singapore distribution reduces accuracy to 72.8%. These findings demonstrate technical feasibility but do not establish an observed or causal exposure-affect association. The study provides a framework for future jointly collected mobile EEG-environment studies. Implementation: https://github.com/r11up/geo-cog

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from r11up/geo-cog. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.20807, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections