Papers › Self-Speculation for Faster Reasoning Models

Self-Speculation for Faster Reasoning Models

17 Jun 2026arXiv:2608.20359added by Syntology

Ravisri Valluri, Tung Nguyen, Aditya Grover

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large language models (LLMs) are deployed for increasingly complex tasks involving planning and multi-step decision making, but high-quality performance on these tasks often requires generating long reasoning traces. This is a poor fit for latency-sensitive and interactive applications like voice assistants or coding agents, where generation latency can strongly affect user experience. Existing acceleration methods typically focus on token-level generation, without utilizing the structure of reasoning workflows. We introduce SSR: Self-Speculation for Reasoning Models, a training-free self-speculative decoding method that leverages the chain-of-thought (CoT) as a source of speculation. SSR uses the partial-CoT answer distribution as the drafter and the full-CoT distribution as the verifier, deriving both from the same model at different reasoning budgets. This builds on the observation that later partial-CoT responses often exhibit greater semantic and lexical overlap with the full-budget response. Due to this overlap, SSR can accept long draft prefixes at once, leading to large speedups on structured and long-form generation tasks. To further exploit draft-response overlap beyond the contiguous prefix accepted by standard speculative decoding, SSR also incorporates suffix decoding, using the draft to seed a suffix cache and recover useful spans beyond the accepted prefix, further reducing latency on tasks with high lexical overlap between the draft and the final response. We evaluate SSR on multiple structured and long-form generation tasks where it is most useful, and demonstrate a relative improvement of up to 24.1% on total generation latency for popular open-source models such as Qwen3.5 and Gemma-4.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 9 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 10 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Ravi-VK/SSR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.20359, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections