Papers › TransfHAR: Self-Supervised Wrist Representations for On-Demand Activity Recognition

TransfHAR: Self-Supervised Wrist Representations for On-Demand Activity Recognition

16 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.15861added by Syntology

Aidan Bradshaw, Riku Arakawa, Xin Liu, Karan Ahuja

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Fine-grained wrist activity recognition can support applications such as procedural step guidance and context-aware assistance, yet acquiring labeled data for every new task, user, and activity granularity remains a bottleneck. We present TransfHAR, a self-supervised wrist IMU framework for on-demand, fine-grained activity recognition by learning transferable motion priors from global, unlabeled activities. We show that self-supervised pretraining on coarse wrist IMU activities (e.g., sitting, walking, exercise) learns motion structure rich enough to transfer to fine-grained manipulative, gestural, and procedural activities (e.g., snapping, stirring, waving) that are absent from pretraining. We implement TransfHAR as a real-time smartwatch application that lets users define and expand their own activity set for personalized recognition from only a few demonstrations. Across three offline cross-dataset evaluations, TransfHAR matches or exceeds fully supervised baselines that use complete label sets with equal or additional sensor channels, by 6.2 balanced-accuracy points on average. In an in-lab study with 10 participants each performing seven novel wrist activities, TransfHAR reaches 86.7% balanced accuracy across participants with five examples per class and 90.4% when updated from a single one-minute recording per class. These results indicate that broad self-supervised wrist pretraining provides an effective foundation for on-demand fine-grained activity recognition.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.15861")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Abradshaw1/IMU_LM_Data found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran
1unverified

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Abradshaw1/IMU_LM_Data. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

convert_unit Abradshaw1/IMU_LM_Data/UTILS/helpers.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 8d1f6bf275d9c68e · report
zscore_normalize Abradshaw1/IMU_LM_Data/UTILS/helpers.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 37b1a301bd5ea15e · report
resample_df Abradshaw1/IMU_LM_Data/UTILS/helpers.py found in paper text by Syntology unverified no licence file found · pointer only · 9678bc597affc661 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.15861, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections