Papers › Temporal Graph Prototype-conditioned Conformal Prediction for Fraud Detection

Temporal Graph Prototype-conditioned Conformal Prediction for Fraud Detection

16 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.15768added by Syntology

Xudong Chen, Shengbo Gong, Lu Cheng, Wei Jin

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Conformal prediction (CP) provides distribution-free coverage guarantees and has emerged as a principled tool for uncertainty quantification. In edge-level fraud detection on temporal interaction graphs, where false positives and false negatives both carry substantial cost, such coverage guarantees are particularly appealing for risk-aware decision making. However, directly applying existing graph conformal predictors yields inefficient prediction sets due to two recurring properties of fraud data. Fraudulent interactions are often embedded in benign-dominated neighborhoods that dilute calibration signals, while extreme class imbalance leaves scarce labeled-fraud support in the calibration split and leads to overly conservative class-conditional thresholds. To address these issues, we propose ProtoCP, a conformal prediction framework for edge-level fraud detection on temporal graphs. ProtoCP improves calibration efficiency by focusing calibration on fraud-relevant subgraph context and producing more stable nonconformity scores under class imbalance and temporal drift. Specifically, it leverages learned prototypes to suppress benign-dominated noise in the calibration context and introduces a neighborhood-relative scoring mechanism with temporal score diffusion for stable class-conditional calibration. Experiments on four fraud benchmarks (YelpChi, S-FFSD, FTFD, and BankSim) show that ProtoCP achieves the target coverage with consistently smaller prediction sets than state-of-the-art baselines. Our codes are available at https://github.com/Picard1701ent/ProtoCP.git

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Picard1701ent/ProtoCP. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.15768, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections