Papers › Memory-Bounded Continuation of Greedy Sampling for Continual Anomaly Detection

Memory-Bounded Continuation of Greedy Sampling for Continual Anomaly Detection

15 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.15277added by Syntology

Yoon Gyo Jung, Jaewoo Park, Kuan-Chuan Peng, Seongdeok Bang, Octavia Camps

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Greedy sampling produces a compact yet representative summary of normal data, which is essential for reliable anomaly detection that relies on measuring distance from normality. For continual anomaly detection where tasks arrive sequentially, extending greedy sampling is straightforward with unbounded memory through coreset accumulation. However, practical deployment requires fixed memory where the coreset size remains constant regardless of task count. We observe that continued greedy sampling, which iteratively applies greedy selection over previously greedy-sampled sets, effectively preserves representativeness under strict memory limits. Despite discarding data at each step to satisfy the memory constraint, coreset quality degrades gracefully rather than catastrophically, enabling reliable anomaly detection across the tasks. We provide theoretical justification by showing that resulting greedy-continued coreset approximates the oracle coreset within a bounded gap. We instantiate this principle in ContCore, which constructs a greedy-continued coreset through greedy expansion on new task features followed by greedy consolidation to enforce the memory budget. Unlike neural methods susceptible to catastrophic forgetting or naive coreset accumulation requiring unbounded memory, ContCore maintains fixed memory with theoretical guarantees. Empirically, ContCore achieves state-of-the-art performance across 11 task schedules on MVTecAD and VisA, and extends effectively to online continual AD settings where prior methods degrade significantly. Code: https://github.com/jungyg/ContCore

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from jungyg/ContCore. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.15277, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections