Papers › M-LINKX: Multiview Graph Learning for Brain Cognitive Disease Detection
M-LINKX: Multiview Graph Learning for Brain Cognitive Disease Detection
An Phan, Yufei Jin, Xingquan Zhu
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Electroencephalogram (EEG) is a non-invasive and relatively low-cost procedure that measures brain electricity for the detection of cognitive diseases. EEG-based classification of dementia-related conditions, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), remains challenging because EEG signals are noisy, non-stationary, and vary across subjects. Segment-based learning provides a practical way to model long EEG recordings by converting them into fixed-length inputs. For each segment, discriminative information may be explored by using signals within each channel (i.e. electrode), as well as interactions between EEG channels. In this paper, we propose M-LINKX, a multi-view graph learning framework for EEG-based dementia classification. For each segment, we extract channel-level node features and construct multiple functional-connectivity (FC) graph views, where each view is defined by a specific combination of connectivity metric, frequency band, and topology filter, respectively. Instead of relying on message passing over the constructed graphs, M-LINKX follows a simple design in modeling node features and adjacency-based connectivity representations. The graph-view representations are fused using global trainable view weights, and subject-level prediction is obtained by averaging segment-level probabilities. Experiments on two three-class EEG datasets with different diagnostic groups, CAUEEG (HC/MCI/Dementia) and AHEAP (HC/AD/FTD), show that M-LINKX achieves the best subject-level performance under the main experimental settings. Our study suggests that multi-view functional connectivity can improve EEG-based dementia classification when integrated with an appropriate graph-learning architecture. Code and data are available at https://github.com/anphantt/MLINKX.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.14847")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 10 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
10 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 10 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from anphantt/MLINKX. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
7d90ddedc7df36dd · report
53eabd6879ebef63 · report
7b88065dabeb2646 · report
1eea5d9020463d94 · report
c334c299e0fbbd6a · report
879654a3ac00bdea · report
d2da2221320b39cb · report
e5a9b53555e5a6d7 · report
11ae77cfc4ae7e48 · report
96b55ac202b9a541 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.14847, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections