Papers › Wolff-Parkinson-White Detection at 471:1 Class Imbalance: A Leakage-Controlled Study...
Wolff-Parkinson-White Detection at 471:1 Class Imbalance: A Leakage-Controlled Study of the Data Bottleneck
Nathael Altman
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is a congenital cardiac pre-excitation, clinically important and often missed on the resting 12-lead ECG. Detection is hard: the signature is subtle and the condition rare. We pool two public 12-lead corpora, PTB-XL and Chapman-Shaoxing-Ningbo: 66,951 recordings, 142 of them WPW, a prevalence of 0.21% (about 471:1). Under one pre-specified, leakage-controlled protocol, with a held-out fold contacted exactly once, we compare seven representations of the signal, holding the split and the evaluation fixed. Within these corpora and under a modest compute budget, added diversity and capacity do not raise the ceiling: the most orthogonal detector significantly hurts, a feature-union model matches a two-member vote, a convolutional network reaches the wavelet detector without exceeding it, and self-supervised pretraining fails a pre-specified gate. A leak-free learning curve, re-selecting features at every size, still rises at the full 115 positives for the strongest deployed detector (paired 90-to-100% difference +0.027, 95% CI [0.019, 0.033]), so it is not shown to have saturated. An error analysis tested against independent evidence finds that the missed cases have a narrower QRS, confirmed by an on-machine measurement outside our pipeline after we show the sign of this effect depends on which delineator measures it; that uncertain labels show no enrichment among the misses; and that some apparent false positives are recordings the corpus itself codes as pre-excited, placing part of the label problem in the negative class. We measure the optimism of non-nested selection at 0.11 to 0.13 average precision. The deployed output is a percentile rank in a frozen reference distribution, not a probability. On the held-out fold, on 14 positives, it reaches an average precision of 0.595 and an ROC area of 0.950. It is a screening pre-filter, not a diagnostic tool.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Syntology holds the repository link but has not harvested or run code from it.
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.14633, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections