Papers › Robust Dual-Model Collaborative Random Vector Functional Link Network

Robust Dual-Model Collaborative Random Vector Functional Link Network

13 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.13628added by Syntology

A. Quadir, A. Rahaman, Mushir Akhtar, M. Tanveer

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Random vector functional link (RVFL) networks are lightweight and fast neural models that offer efficient training and strong generalization through randomized hidden-layer weights and direct input-output connections. However, conventional RVFL models are sensitive to noisy labels, outliers, and imbalanced data, which limits their performance in real-world applications. To address these challenges, we propose the kernel risk-sensitive mean p-power based RVFL (KRPRVFL) model, which integrates the computational efficiency of RVFL with the robustness of the kernel risk-sensitive mean p-power (KRP) criterion. By replacing the standard least-squares objective with a KRP-based loss, KRPRVFL adaptively reduces the influence of corrupted or unreliable samples during training, resulting in improved stability and generalization. Additionally, a collaborative learning mechanism is introduced to enable adaptive interaction among model components, further enhancing robustness in complex and noisy environments. The proposed framework also leverages kernel-induced feature mapping to capture nonlinear relationships without requiring explicit hidden-layer selection, maintaining both efficiency and scalability. Extensive experiments on UCI and KEEL benchmark datasets demonstrate that KRPRVFL consistently outperforms baseline models in terms of accuracy, robustness, and statistical significance, highlighting its effectiveness as a fast, scalable, and reliable solution for challenging classification tasks.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 11 ran; 6 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 11 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from mtanveer1/KRPRVFL. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.13628, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections