Papers › CosMAP: Contrastive Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimensionality Reduction...
CosMAP: Contrastive Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimensionality Reduction of Omics and Genealogical Data
Fenosoa Randrianjatovo, Maya Saleh, Simon Girard, Amadou Barry
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Omics datasets, particularly single-cell RNA sequencing data, are high-dimensional, sparse, noisy, and dominated by zero values, making faithful low-dimensional representation challenging. Existing dimensionality-reduction methods may distort local neighbourhoods, global organization, or the cohesion of meaningful populations, with similar limitations arising in genealogical data. We introduce Contrastive Manifold Approximation and Projection (CosMAP), a graph-based unsupervised dimensionality-reduction method for producing faithful and interpretable embeddings. CosMAP extends the graph-based framework of UMAP by combining cosine-similarity neighbourhoods with temperature-normalized contrastive affinities, which are optimized in the embedding space using an attractive--repulsive objective. It further employs a two-phase refinement strategy: an intermediate higher-dimensional representation is first learned and then used to reconstruct the neighbourhood graph and initialize the final low-dimensional embedding. We evaluate CosMAP on MNIST and USPS handwritten-digit datasets, mouse retina and cortex single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets, and a large genealogical kinship dataset derived from BALSAC-CARTaGENE. Compared with state-of-the-art dimensionality-reduction methods, CosMAP produces more coherent visual representations, improves neighbourhood preservation, and provides clearer global organization of digit classes, biological cell populations, and regional genealogical patterns. These results indicate that CosMAP offers a robust framework for exploratory analysis of complex, sparse, high-dimensional data. The implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/FenosoaRandrianjatovo/CosMAP-dr.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.11269")
Code
Syntology Ran 13 of 20 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · honoured contract; 9 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 20 samples from 1 repository, 13 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
20 samples harvested; 13 ran; 3 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from FenosoaRandrianjatovo/CosMAP-dr. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
429ff61a236622ac · report
60bab217e307ead5 · report
1241e28c5451ee6b · report
85b149c0508edf9f · report
f1934dc514a9afa5 · report
eff86f2d4e9fc08d · report
dd70820bd1be6039 · report
37bbdcf7831dd1a6 · report
4e414e56af9b8775 · report
fee7676fdff5c2bb · report
3aab66a2791f7467 · report
815c20c8f9783563 · report
b134b21ef383d8ba · report
d5719f2aef646d6b · report
160725427a3abf52 · report
0636c310dfb40b34 · report
9f3336ea81babf35 · report
b417673f76e957b4 · report
397e0e38f95f79f9 · report
b14bbd1e57c1239d · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.11269, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections