Papers › TSPORec: Token Selection via Preference Optimization for LLM-Based Sequential Recommendation

TSPORec: Token Selection via Preference Optimization for LLM-Based Sequential Recommendation

10 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.09605added by Syntology

Wenqiao Zhu, Chao Xu, Haipang Wu, Ji Liu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for improving recommendation systems. The effectiveness of LLMs arises from their ability to harness rich textual information and their capacity to model heterogeneous user preferences based on users' interaction history. However, due to the large-scale and deep architectures, LLM-based sequential recommendation approaches generally incur high inference costs, resulting in a low return on investment. To mitigate this cost, many existing approaches resort to using only the first few tokens of item descriptions, which inadvertently discards valuable information contained in the full text, thereby leading to suboptimal recommendation performance. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Token Selection approach for Preference Optimization in LLM-based sequential Recommendation, i.e., TSPORec, which accurately pinpoints informative tokens throughout the entire textual content to improve recommendation performance. Specifically, we design a three-stage pipeline to select informative tokens and introduce a novel proxy reward to facilitate the implementation. TSPORec not only enhances recommendation performance but also improves computational efficiency. Extensive experiments across two models and datasets demonstrate the superb performance (up to 31.25%) and efficiency (up to 63.4%) of our approach compared with six baseline approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/WNQzhu/TSPORec.git.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.09605")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 4 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

WNQzhu/TSPORec found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
2ran

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from WNQzhu/TSPORec. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

activation_layer WNQzhu/TSPORec/code/RQVAE/models/layers.py found in paper text by Syntology ran no licence file found · pointer only · fc089588049a4d8c · report
kmeans WNQzhu/TSPORec/code/RQVAE/models/layers.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · bbf91ec0c63ba439 · report
set_color WNQzhu/TSPORec/code/RQVAE/utils.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 7d293b248ebcd0f3 · report
sinkhorn_algorithm WNQzhu/TSPORec/code/RQVAE/models/layers.py found in paper text by Syntology ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 8b9b8de1d67ec07c · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.09605, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections