Papers › Inductive Graph Layout with Implicit Neural Fields

Inductive Graph Layout with Implicit Neural Fields

9 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.08876added by Syntology

Berfin Inal, Daniel Probst

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

A graph layout is normally a table of N free coordinates. We optimise a function with a fixed number of parameters instead. This gives a drawing a sample complexity and an extensible domain. Force-directed algorithms remain the standard tools for graph drawing. The most accurate among them minimise stress in the Kamada-Kawai formulation by directly optimising the node coordinates, at a full objective cost of O(N²) in time and space. Here, we propose Fling (Field Layout via Implicit Neural Geometry), a small neural network mapping the distances of each node to a set of landmarks, positioning it in the plane by training on the layout energy. The full spring system then becomes tractable without its distance matrix, as rest lengths follow from a landmark bound in constant time per pair while a second network learns the majorisation sums from exact anchor rows, at O(|𝒜|N) per step for |𝒜|≪N anchors. Unlike neural drawers that read the graph by message passing, we represent the drawing as a function of node features. An unseen node costs one forward pass, where sparse and low-rank majorisation remain transductive. As the unknowns are weights rather than coordinates, the energy only requires a small fraction of the nodes, and a field fitted that way outperforms PivotMDS, landmark MDS, and a kernel ridge trained on the same energy and features, when the task is fitting the energy of a graph from a sample of its nodes. In addition, the same parameterisation enables a stochastic pivot stress variant, an aesthetics-optimised variant carrying a neighbour-embedding energy with node-edge clearance and crossing terms on the same field, and conditioning on the weight between two energies gives a whole layout family from one run.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

15 samples harvested; 10 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 15 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from daenuprobst/fling-layout. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.08876, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections