Papers › MS-MLB: An Open Machine Learning Benchmark for Blood-Based MS Classification
MS-MLB: An Open Machine Learning Benchmark for Blood-Based MS Classification
Adam Simson, Ankush Dutta, Quang Bui
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is diagnosed through clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory evidence when appropriate, and exclusion of better explanations. Blood RNA expression data may contain disease associated immune signal, but a blood RNA classifier cannot be treated as a replacement for clinical diagnosis. This paper presents MS-MLB (Multiple Sclerosis Machine Learning Benchmark), a reproducible open benchmark for machine learning based MS research classification from whole blood RNA expression data. MS-MLB uses the public GSE17048 cohort, converts it into an MS versus healthy control task, and evaluates multiple algorithms under a shared, leakage controlled pipeline that a researcher can rerun without reconfiguring the evaluation. The evaluation includes nested cross-validation, an untouched stratified holdout set, bootstrap confidence intervals, ROC and precision recall analysis, calibration measurement, and an exploratory MS Research Score. In the final benchmark summary, Gradient Boosting ranked first by MS Research Score on the holdout set, with an MS Research Score of 93.83, AUC-ROC of 0.989, sensitivity of 0.950, specificity of 0.778, F₁ score of 0.927, and Brier score of 0.050. Prior studies have applied machine learning to MS blood transcriptomic data, including PBMC stage classification and whole blood diagnostic signature modeling. The contribution here is different and narrower. To our knowledge, MS-MLB is the first open benchmark focused on MS versus healthy control classification from GSE17048 whole blood RNA expression data with a documented external model submission pathway built into the framework. The score is intended for research comparison only and has not been clinically validated. The benchmark is accessible here: https://github.com/duckyquang/MS-MLB.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.05196")
Code
Syntology Ran 4 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 5 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
5 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 5 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from duckyquang/MS-MLB. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
3313d0137c1ff453 · report
92f9924d25bab311 · report
0b7eca63a077ae79 · report
b198e5134d030da0 · report
c04a8a22de0cefec · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.05196, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections