Papers › Comparing SGLD and a fixed-noise Predictor-Corrector adaptation in canonical Joint...
Comparing SGLD and a fixed-noise Predictor-Corrector adaptation in canonical Joint Energy-Based Models on CIFAR-10
Dmytro Knopov
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Joint Energy-Based Models (JEM) unify classification and generation within a single network and support out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. Canonical JEM training relies on stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD); a theoretically motivated alternative, the Predictor-Corrector (PC) sampler, has not previously undergone a systematic replication test on the canonical model. We reproduce canonical JEM on WideResNet-28-10 without normalisation layers on two independent runs and test a fixed-noise PC adaptation - with the degenerate annealed-noise predictor replaced by a deterministic gradient step - across three protocols: the adapted sampler replacing SGLD throughout the full training trajectories (115-132 epochs); cold-start generation (FID); and refinement-style multi-OOD detection (AUROC). The reconstruction reaches 92.88% test accuracy and buffer-FID 44.46 (canonical: 92.9% and 38.40). We document two failure modes: catastrophic late-training divergence with the signature of the canonical outlier-buffer mechanism (all four runs), and run-dependent SVHN OOD-discrimination dynamics. No consistent method-level advantage of the adaptation over SGLD is observed on any protocol: refinement AUROC differences stay below 0.007 across ten checkpoint-OOD pairs; seeded cold-start generation favours SGLD by about five FID points; on the training protocol a hierarchical seed-by-image bootstrap gives a 95% confidence interval on the macro-averaged AUROC difference that contains zero, while a seed-level equivalence test with two runs per method cannot establish formal equivalence. The training-protocol data are consistent both with equivalence and with a small directional effect. This outcome is consistent with theory: the guarantees of the annealed-noise PC framework do not transfer to the constant-noise regime of canonical JEM.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.05025")
Code
Syntology Ran 11 of 15 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 11 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 15 samples from 1 repository, 11 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
15 samples harvested; 11 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from DmytroKnopov/jem-sampler-comparison. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
72c1ee3c4d10eb63 · report
77539c616f826317 · report
8921c60b31b86b51 · report
842b64fc488fb0fe · report
f1ed6e5901ff22a7 · report
08dc34ecb3bee707 · report
54ac5e72c1abdbc7 · report
e979513a0036fe2d · report
8a966a0ff327f634 · report
c2657c2b6efd9d09 · report
adbe3fb064bba022 · report
0ee7d39198315638 · report
ab8be929b79ed2ce · report
39fab347948782d2 · report
5e3e432b6d99f283 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.05025, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology
Syntology's extractor considered 3 leaderboards for this paper and placed the paper on none of them: 3 refused by a rule. What is not shown.
Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections