Papers › NodeJEPA: Structure-Conditioned Latent Prediction for Node-Level Graph Self-Supervised Learning
NodeJEPA: Structure-Conditioned Latent Prediction for Node-Level Graph Self-Supervised Learning
Tinghe Zhang, Jian Xu, Jiaheng Chen, Jiaxing Li, Yucheng Xiao, Qiang Wang
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Self-supervised learning on graphs is largely shaped by contrastive methods that depend on carefully designed augmentations, and by generative methods that reconstruct node attributes in the input space. Both paradigms can entangle representations with low-level input statistics rather than with relational structure. Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA) instead learn by predicting latent targets rather than reconstructing inputs. Recent work has explored this idea for graph-level representation learning, but how to design JEPA-style objectives for node-level tasks, and which structural signals the predictor should condition on, remains less clear. We present NodeJEPA, a joint-embedding predictive architecture for node-level graph self-supervised learning. NodeJEPA masks structure-aware k-hop ego-subgraphs and trains a context encoder to predict the latent representations of the masked nodes. These targets come from an EMA-updated target encoder with stop-gradient. A structure-conditioned predictor integrates spectral and centrality descriptors through cross-attention. Variance, covariance, and Laplacian spectral regularizers help stabilize the embedding geometry, and an optional curriculum gradually increases masking difficulty during training. Because prediction occurs in latent space, NodeJEPA does not rely on input reconstruction or hand-crafted graph augmentations. We evaluate NodeJEPA on standard node classification benchmarks under linear probing and fine-tuning protocols, and conduct ablations on masking, prediction, and regularization design choices. Our study offers a practical recipe for node-level JEPA-style latent prediction on graphs, and clarifies when structural conditioning helps representation learning. Code, configurations, and evaluation scripts are publicly available at https://github.com/OliverZ-dot/Node-Jepa.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.04381")
Code
Syntology Ran 12 of 17 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it; 6 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 17 samples from 1 repository, 12 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
17 samples harvested; 12 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 17 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from OliverZ-dot/Node-Jepa. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
57219a03c9cb5757 · report
99c7dfa1c9127cb9 · report
38bc69034098a9ee · report
5c55b7715410bef0 · report
19854bd59ba09b36 · report
0175237cb3fa48e8 · report
f47307da1bbcd7da · report
5a0a26104f4334cc · report
1d43014330ce4939 · report
f14f7534467dee76 · report
46d4aa1a9c34bff8 · report
0c4d799d3b3bfc99 · report
364cb718f721b853 · report
e7ab863ffa7d71c7 · report
f40252b50a3e542d · report
30fdfee53efea3e7 · report
866a221d1952f83e · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.04381, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections