Papers › Federated generative event models for tokenized electronic health records
Federated generative event models for tokenized electronic health records
Michael C. Burkhart, Luke Solo, Inhyeok Lee, S'Khaja Charles, Zewei "Whiskey" Liao, Kaveri Chhikara, Dema Therese, Wan-Ting Liao, Catherine A. Gao, William F. Parker, Brett K. Beaulieu-Jones
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Electronic health record foundation models are limited by institutionally siloed data and substantial performance degradation under cross-site transfer. We evaluated federated training of tokenized generative event models (GEMs) across 122,251 intensive care hospitalizations from three independent health systems harmonized to the Common Longitudinal ICU Data Format. Models were assessed on 12 post-24-hour clinical prediction tasks using within-site, cross-site, centralized, and federated training configurations. GEMs achieved the highest mean within-site and cross-site ROC-AUC and were substantially more transportable than conventional supervised models: their average cross-site penalties were 0.025 ROC-AUC and 0.027 PR-AUC, compared with 0.079 and 0.089 for LightGBM. Federated Learning (FedAvg and FedAvgM) approached the performance of centralized GEM training, with most gains obtained within 5-10 communication rounds. However, centralized multi-site training provided only modest improvements over complete local training. Multi-site models were most useful when local training data were limited, with their advantage narrowing as institutional data accumulated. These findings show that federated GEM training is technically feasible and preserves most centralized performance, but that the main open challenge is learning transportable representations to translate larger, but heterogeneous data from multiple health systems into a reliable target-site benefit.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.02939")
Code
Syntology Ran 4 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 6 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
6 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from bbj-lab/coreopsis. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
ae8dd1052ccd2327 · report
b7dbc0a1a6178a61 · report
e4981ff27bed70c7 · report
1594174ea0ff58d6 · report
a07f015da72cfc2c · report
d2c193ef453aefa3 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.02939, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections