Papers › Your Agentic LLMs Secretly Encode Indirect Prompt-Injection Exposure in Hidden States

Your Agentic LLMs Secretly Encode Indirect Prompt-Injection Exposure in Hidden States

1 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.02657added by Syntology

Jianshuo Dong, Yiming Liu, Maosen Zhang, Nan Deng, Peng Xu, Xiaoping Zhang, Tianwei Zhang, Jie Zhang, Han Qiu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Agentic LLMs are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) attacks, e.g., malicious side-tasks hidden in external tool results. While many efforts have sought to address this threat, little is known about the internals of agentic LLMs when they are exposed to IPI attacks. For simplicity, we refer to this condition as IPI exposure. In this paper, we study IPI exposure from three perspectives. (1) Probing: Across eight models, including the 753B-parameter GLM-5.2 and the 2.8T-parameter Kimi-K3, simple linear probes trained on pre-generation hidden states can predict LLMs' IPI exposure. These probes achieve 0.90+ AUROC on unseen attacks, agent instructions, and task suites; they remain robustly predictive under adaptive attacks and in cross-lingual settings. (2) Defense: We reveal and diagnose a knowledge-action gap: post-trained LLMs encode signals predictive of IPI exposure, yet do not reliably bind these signals to safe agentic actions. We therefore introduce a probe-gated reasoning-based defense to bridge this gap at test time. On difficult AgentDojo settings, it substantially reduces attack success rate, e.g., from 34.6% to 0% on Qwen3.5-27B, and better preserves clean-task utility than the baselines. (3) Explanation: We introduce an analysis framework that identifies natural-language explanations strongly correlated with probe-captured signals. The resulting profiles differ across models: latent signals can align with either direct IPI-exposure sensing or indirect operational cues. Code is available at https://github.com/jianshuod/IPI-exposure-signal.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from jianshuod/IPI-exposure-signal. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.02657, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections