Papers › Diffusion Policy with Behavioral Advantage Correction for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Diffusion Policy with Behavioral Advantage Correction for Offline Reinforcement Learning

3 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.02332added by Syntology

Botao Dong, Longyang Huang, Ning Pang, Hongtian Chen

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

In offline reinforcement learning (RL), the distribution shift between behavioral data and the learned policy can lead to erroneous \emph{Q}-value estimation, thereby misguiding the direction of policy optimization. To address this issue, we develop a behavioral advantage corrected policy evaluation (BAC-PE) approach, which utilizes the \emph{Q}-function of the behavior policy to correct the learned policy's \emph{Q}-function, thus mitigating pessimistic conservatism and overestimation bias. Furthermore, the convergence of BAC-PE is analyzed theoretically, and an upper bound on the difference between the learned \emph{Q}-function and the true \emph{Q}-function is derived. To alleviate distribution shift, this work employs diffusion models to represent both the behavior policy and the learned policy, performing distribution matching for accurate policy regularization. Additionally, \emph{Q}-value guidance is incorporated into the training process to achieve effective policy improvement. By combining BAC-PE with diffusion policy modeling, we propose the diffusion policy with behavioral advantage correction (DPBAC) algorithm. Compared to existing offline methods, DPBAC demonstrates stronger policy representation capabilities and effectively mitigates the bias in \emph{Q}-value estimation. Experimental results on multiple domains of D4RL tasks show that DPBAC achieves superior performance, with notable advantages over state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

20 samples harvested; 18 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 12 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 5 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.02332, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Placed on leaderboards by Syntology Syntology

Syntology's extractor considered 1 leaderboard for this paper and did not place the paper on it: 1 refused by a rule. What is not shown.

Syntology has checked 6,795 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections