Papers › UDT: Reconciling U-Nets and Diffusion Transformers with Data-Adaptive Token Reduction
UDT: Reconciling U-Nets and Diffusion Transformers with Data-Adaptive Token Reduction
Junno Yun, Yaşar Utku Alçalar, Mehmet Akçakaya
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) have emerged as a core architecture in generative modeling due to their scalability and adaptability to multimodal tasks. DiTs comprise isotropic transformer blocks, and learn representations progressively across depth, where the denoising objective drives later layers to focus on fine-detail reconstruction. This results in degraded representation quality and an imbalanced encoder-decoder behavior. Prior approaches such as representation alignment (REPA) mitigate this by encouraging stronger early representations via training regularization. Alternatively, U-Net-style DiT architectures introduce explicit multi-scale encoder-decoder structures for improved convergence. But they build on standard U-Net wisdom via learnable operators for spatial downsampling, which are not well-suited to transformer architectures, introducing inefficiencies and compatibility issues with components such as cross-attention and representation regularization. In this work, we propose UDT, a U-Net diffusion transformer that combines the representation power of DiTs with the encoding-decoding benefits of U-Nets, through data-adaptive token merging for downsampling and upsampling, while preserving the DiT token dimension. Our baseline UDT architecture outperforms existing U-Net DiTs and achieves performance comparable to REPA across all model sizes. Furthermore, using architectural optimization and REPA, UDT outperforms SiT's 7.9 FID at 1400 epochs (w/o CFG) within 40 epochs (~ 40x faster convergence) for XL model size on 256x256 ImageNet. Finally, it achieves strong image generation performance with CFG, reaching FID of 1.38 (320 epochs) with SD-VAE and 1.35 (500 epochs) with VA-VAE, providing a new backbone for DiTs with strong empirical benefits.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2608.01298")
Code
Syntology Ran 14 of 20 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran · fixture could not drive it; 7 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 19 samples from 1 repository, 13 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
20 samples harvested; 14 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 20 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from JN-Yun/UDT. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
7a122209a9457bd0 · report
813b038557b60edd · report
9a95d88a2519390e · report
5997b89997ac7e41 · report
132dc6ca8683503e · report
29cbfcbffd4bd38f · report
64e4c00ba026c8e5 · report
d5580b3fb66f103c · report
58a82fed4cc8a4d8 · report
7b75bf9ed4e14ba7 · report
0c991bde9f1d8f95 · report
d49c2d2942e53c88 · report
f55137c53a3a4557 · report
f3e68b726a668eb8 · report
79eb22210c6b30d5 · report
dfafa843246491e7 · report
6dc4ec7d0b39acf8 · report
4509f0ab71bc54ca · report
f303c3aef5017fe1 · report
20ff6d11dd593018 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.01298, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections