Papers › Generated Images Are Easier to Forget: A Machine Unlearning Perspective for Synthetic...

Generated Images Are Easier to Forget: A Machine Unlearning Perspective for Synthetic Image Detection

1 Aug 2026arXiv:2608.00716added by Syntology

Jun Nie, Yonggang Zhang, Tongliang Liu, Yiu-ming Cheung, Bo Han, Xinmei Tian

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Robust detection of generated images is critical to counter the misuse of generative models. Existing methods primarily depend on learning from human-annotated training datasets, limiting their generalization to unseen distributions. In contrast, large-scale vision models (LVMs) pre-trained on web-scale datasets exhibit exceptional generalization power through exposure to diverse distributions, offering a transformative paradigm for this task. However, our experimental results reveal that LVMs pre-trained on natural-image-dominated data can effectively capture the features of both natural and generated images, yielding comparably low losses and thus limited discriminative capacity between them. This prompts a key question: When and how do LVMs exhibit different behaviors when capturing features of natural and generated images? This investigation reveals an insight: during unlearning, LVMs exhibit disparate forgetting dynamics with feature degradation for generated images escalating faster than natural ones. Inspired by the disparate dynamics, we introduce two detection methods: 1) data-free detection, which prunes model parameters to induce unlearning without data access, and 2) data-driven detection, which optimizes LVMs to unlearn knowledge tied to generated images. Extensive experiments conducted on various benchmarks demonstrate that our unlearning-based approach outperforms conventional detection methods. By recasting the detection task as a problem of machine unlearning, our work establishes a new paradigm for generated image detection.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

15 samples harvested; 15 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 15 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ZhendongWang6/DIRE. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2608.00716, was issued in August 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections