Papers › TOOD: Task-Aware Out-of-Distribution Score Calibration for Continual Learners

TOOD: Task-Aware Out-of-Distribution Score Calibration for Continual Learners

31 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.29592added by Syntology

Mostafa ElAraby, Samer B. Nashed, Liam Paull

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The primary challenge of continual learning (CL) systems is to learn new tasks while remaining performant on previously learned tasks. A similarly important though less well-studied aspect of CL systems is their ability to distinguish inputs that are unlikely to come from within the set of tasks the system has already encountered, often called out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. This paper presents several findings related to the dynamics of OOD detection in CL systems, causes of performance degradation over time which we call OOD forgetting (OODF), and proposed mitigation strategies for this degradation. Chiefly, we find the unintuitive result that OODF is only weakly anti-correlated with classification performance on previous tasks, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms producing OODF are distinct. Moreover, this effect is observed for both energy-based and feature-based OOD detection methods. Energy-based detectors suffer a drop in logit scale as additional tasks are learned, which we term the Confidence Gap, while feature-based detectors also degrade under a complementary effect we call Manifold Crowding. Motivated by these observations, we propose TOOD, a training-free post-hoc method that decomposes logits into per-task energy scores and re-calibrates them using replay-buffer statistics. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and a 100-task ImageNet-1K stream show that TOOD improves OOD detection performance over uncalibrated energy in most settings and ranks first or second in nine of ten CIFAR configurations, with the largest gains when the confidence gap is most severe. These results suggest that a substantial portion of OOD deterioration in continual learning arises from score miscalibration rather than from a complete loss of discriminative structure.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 8 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from mostafaelaraby/tood-continual-ood. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.29592, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections