Papers › FloDR: An invertible dimensionality reduction method based on a normalising flow

FloDR: An invertible dimensionality reduction method based on a normalising flow

28 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.26278added by Syntology

Abdallah Baraka, Daniel Probst

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

It is common for two-dimensional embeddings of high-dimensional data to be read far beyond what they can support. Distances in and between clusters, the meaning behind empty spaces, and the amount of structure hidden at each point are generally invisible in the output of methods such as t-SNE and UMAP. This is because the information that could support the meaning of these properties is discarded during the optimisation process. Here, we present FloDR, a dimensionality reduction method that embeds data through an invertible normalising flow. While FloDR only uses the first two output coordinates to create a two-dimensional embedding, it retains the remaining coordinates rather than discarding them. In addition to the embedding, an exact inverse and an exact density are properties of a trained mapping, which enable diagnostic visualisations that are computed from the exact inverse of the model that drew the layout rather than from an approximate one. Specifically, we draw two fields, the conditional spread, which measures how much of the original data remains undetermined at each embedding position in input units, and the hidden contrast, which measures how much information about a labelled contrast the two plotted coordinates discard. Both fields are rendered with a prespecified test against a held out portion of the input data and a bootstrap confidence. A field that fails the test is reported as refused.

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2607.26278")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 6 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 6 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

daenuprobst/flodr found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

6ran

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from daenuprobst/flodr. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

occupancy_field daenuprobst/flodr/src/flodr/viz.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · 5ea4ffcc34e9cede · report
preprocess daenuprobst/flodr/src/flodr/data.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · d3bc48aac41efed8 · report
raw_coords daenuprobst/flodr/src/flodr/data.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted MIT (permissive) · f09fa12dadaa2aab · report
residual daenuprobst/flodr/src/flodr/viz.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · a259e1f617a3327d · report
residual_fraction daenuprobst/flodr/src/flodr/viz.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · 432973956677d18e · report
spectral_init daenuprobst/flodr/src/flodr/data.py found in paper text by Syntology ran MIT (permissive) · e6d4f494e8ee5946 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.26278, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections