Papers › CruiseBench: A Real-Flight-Aligned N-CMAPSS Benchmark for Engine RUL Prediction
CruiseBench: A Real-Flight-Aligned N-CMAPSS Benchmark for Engine RUL Prediction
Pu Cheng, Qiang Miao
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction estimates how long an engine can continue safe operation and is central to maintenance planning. N-CMAPSS extends C-MAPSS by simulating run-to-failure aero-engine trajectories using recorded real-flight profiles and retaining complete within-flight time series rather than cycle-level snapshots. However, this added realism reduces evaluation control because full-flight records increase data volume and entangle degradation cues with operating-regime variation, complicating preprocessing choices and direct comparisons of RUL modeling performance. To mitigate this issue, this paper proposes CruiseBench, a cruise-stage RUL benchmark derived from N-CMAPSS. It introduces CPM-N-CMAPSS (Cruising-Period Mask for N-CMAPSS), a mask artifact that stores cycle-local cruising intervals identified by the common-altitude method for the nine accessible subdatasets. CruiseBench applies a fixed protocol to the masked rows, using scenario descriptors and measured sensors as inputs while excluding virtual sensors, health parameters, and auxiliary metadata from the feature tensor, preserving native-resolution windows, and applying dataset-wise RUL caps. Experiments with LSTM, GRU, TCN, and TSMixer provide baseline results for this setting. Under CruiseBench-eta5-W256-S10, TSMixer obtains the lowest average RMSE, 3.4±1.71, and Saxena score, (2.50±2.99)×10⁴. Ablation studies show that flight-stage selection, temporal downscaling method, and RUL-cap threshold affect reported results. With its fixed cruise-stage protocol, CruiseBench provides a reproducible sub-benchmark for controlled RUL model comparison and CPM-N-CMAPSS provides a stage-specific data foundation for future transfer-learning and domain-adaptation studies.
In Syntology For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2607.19380")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 6 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 6 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
6 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from NostalgiaJohn/CruiseBench. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e96fb3d6b15d146b · report
ee1c24e4196875ad · report
2d61d7bb4c1a3933 · report
6edd5a0c8bc0d21c · report
6766b656551c9bf0 · report
1f1681545fb44bc2 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.19380, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections