Papers › Seq2Synth: Benchmarking Temporal Fidelity in Synthetic Sequential Tabular Data

Seq2Synth: Benchmarking Temporal Fidelity in Synthetic Sequential Tabular Data

17 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.15606added by Syntology

Kiwan Kwon, Kangmin Kim, Hojin Lee, Yeseong Jung, Hyeongwoo Kong, Vamsi K. Potluru, Saerom Park, Yongjae Lee

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Synthetic sequential tabular data are increasingly used for privacy-preserving data sharing and data-driven research, but evaluating their fidelity remains difficult because temporal structure is easily lost under conventional tabular metrics. Existing single-table and relational evaluation protocols largely collapse records into static distributions, leaving timestamp validity, time-conditioned population structure, within-entity dynamics, and temporal relational structure insufficiently tested. We introduce Seq2Synth, a taxonomy-guided benchmark for evaluating whether synthetic sequential tabular data preserve these temporal structures. The taxonomy characterizes datasets by time representation, sampling regularity, cross-trajectory dependence, and schema structure, and determines which evaluation dimensions are applicable. Seq2Synth reports temporal fidelity across timestamp, cross-sectional, longitudinal, and structural dimensions, and extends utility and privacy evaluation to trajectory-aware settings. Across seven core datasets drawn from a 13-dataset benchmark and eight generators, static-distribution rankings diverge substantially from temporal-aware rankings; models that appear strong under conventional metrics often exhibit invalid timestamps, distorted trajectories, or inconsistent temporal relational structure. These results show that temporal fidelity cannot be inferred from static or relational metrics alone. Our benchmark code is available at https://github.com/KiwanKwon/Seq2Synth.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

21 samples harvested; 15 ran; 4 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 21 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from KiwanKwon/Seq2Synth. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.15606, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections