Papers › On-Policy Delta Distillation

On-Policy Delta Distillation

16 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.15161added by Syntology

Byeongho Heo, Jaehui Hwang, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

On-policy distillation is an alternative post-training method in reinforcement learning that alleviates the constraints imposed by reward models by providing token-level supervision from a teacher model. Although on-policy distillation has been studied and applied across various settings, its fundamental design remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce a new distillation reward, termed the delta signal, instead of directly imitating the teacher's output distribution. The delta signal is defined as the difference between the teacher model and its base model prior to instruction tuning for reasoning capability. It therefore captures the changes induced by reasoning tuning and provides a more direct signal for transferring reasoning capabilities. Using extensive empirical evidence, we show that the delta signal substantially improves on-policy distillation and refer to the new distillation method as On-Policy Delta Distillation (OPD²). Experiments across mathematics, science, and code-reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that OPD² consistently outperforms conventional on-policy distillation, enabling reasoning LLMs to achieve strong performance with only a short post-training period. Code will be available at https://github.com/naver-ai/opd2

PaperPDFCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2607.15161")

Code

Syntology Ran 7 of 7 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 7 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 7 samples from 1 repository, 7 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

naver-ai/opd2 found in paper text by Syntology report

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

7ran

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from naver-ai/opd2. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

load_chat_template naver-ai/opd2/evaluation/patch_gemma_tokenizer.py found in paper text by Syntology ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 6e8ed1c38a0f37ef · report
load_name_to_id naver-ai/opd2/evaluation/patch_gemma_tokenizer.py found in paper text by Syntology ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · ce8ce48730952985 · report
patch_benchmark naver-ai/opd2/evaluation/extended_eval_setting.py found in paper text by Syntology ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 4d15f61745a192de · report
patch_file naver-ai/opd2/evaluation/extended_eval_setting.py found in paper text by Syntology ran Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a6b119664ef50a21 · report
patch_rg_common naver-ai/opd2/evaluation/extended_eval_setting.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 39bdeb0a1b0bc974 · report
patch_template naver-ai/opd2/evaluation/patch_no_think_tokenizer.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · bc4e91faa880741a · report
patch_template naver-ai/opd2/evaluation/patch_only_think_tokenizer.py found in paper text by Syntology ran fingerprinted Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3e727f24b0062b25 · report

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.15161, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections