Papers › Text2Sign: A Single-GPU Diffusion Baseline for Text-to-Sign Language Video Generation
Text2Sign: A Single-GPU Diffusion Baseline for Text-to-Sign Language Video Generation
Ruize Xia
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
Sign language is a primary communication channel for millions of Deaf and hard-of-hearing people, yet text-to-signer video generation remains costly because video diffusion models are expensive to train and evaluate. This paper presents Text2Sign, a text-conditioned diffusion model for short sign-language clips that runs on a single NVIDIA L4 GPU. It combines a frozen vision-language text encoder with a 3D encoder-decoder and factorized spatiotemporal attention to reduce the cost of full-video attention while preserving motion coherence. We compare convolution-only and transformer-style backbones, frozen pretrained and task-specific text encoders, and factorized versus full attention. On a signer-disjoint How2Sign split, the best short-run ablation reaches a validation loss of 0.0648, while a longer-run checkpoint reaches 0.00999. On a compact evaluation slice, the latter achieves an SSIM of 0.2403 ±0.0238, a PSNR of 15.11 ±0.42 dB, and temporal consistency of 1.0000 ±0.0000 using 8-step DDIM sampling with a guidance scale of 5.0. It generates a 32-frame, 64 ×64 clip in 12.60 seconds, or 2.54 frames per second, with peak inference memory of 3.12 GB. A held-out denoising audit shows only weak prompt sensitivity: removing text increases late-timestep loss from 0.9875 to 0.9891, while shuffled prompts perform similarly to correct prompts. Frozen text conditioning therefore improves short-budget validation loss, but prompt-specific separation remains limited. The system is restricted to low-resolution, short clips and lacks expert linguistic evaluation, so it should be viewed as a single-GPU research baseline rather than a complete sign-language production system. Code is available at https://github.com/xiaruize0911/text2sign.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2607.13164")
Code
Syntology Ran 21 of 28 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 7 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 19 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 28 samples from 1 repository, 21 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
28 samples harvested; 21 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 7 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 28 of the 28 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from xiaruize0911/text2sign. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
c3d09298e5fbcef2 · report
b7266a423c86c5c5 · report
df87ada404ead7d5 · report
f79e19059f9a1e05 · report
7632880aba0842ce · report
49fb7023a4f1d66f · report
fb953e8eaf20b156 · report
d86ca65c98c1a798 · report
6f9515960d0929d9 · report
aa21f782d7fadc7d · report
293f6bb9a3443b33 · report
f112df9abab4ed51 · report
aaf27d6744bbb1d2 · report
def041c465dd155a · report
b300d58af9ea5706 · report
cd46b04b9fbcc860 · report
dbcdfec270ed0b9f · report
dc6f452194c57e32 · report
02d05d8b9c20e293 · report
0df386409ec75bec · report
0c9143d6a0de98a9 · report
df119b217f395766 · report
063370d28cf9be5e · report
1d837ca1af2e6b21 · report
48efa0978d537929 · report
ec4ed5b955d48600 · report
91307f53ae0fcded · report
1e32c2b74c14e832 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.13164, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections