Papers › The Nuts and Bolts of Natural Language to SQL Translation: A Systematic Analysis of...
The Nuts and Bolts of Natural Language to SQL Translation: A Systematic Analysis of Model Pipeline Optimisation Approaches and their Interactions
Filip Klubicka, Vasudevan Nedumpozhimana, Sneha Rautmare, Bora Caglayan, Mingxue Wang, John D. Kelleher
Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).
In the age of large language models, Natural Language to SQL (NL2SQL) translation remains an open problem with many useful applications. We explore interactions between several NL2SQL pipeline extensions to inspire development of more lightweight models. Specifically, we integrate the NatSQL intermediate representation, include a preprocessing step and a fine-tuning step based on synthetic data, and develop a novel reranker model to improve SQL selection in the final beam. We perform an ablation study supplemented by a Shapley analysis of these different components integrated with two backbone architectures, SmBoP and RASAT. We find that simply combining all of them does not lead to best results, but that their impact depends on their interactions with the baseline system, as well as each other.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2607.10911")
Code
Syntology Ran 14 of 20 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 6 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 12 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: found in paper text by Syntology: 20 samples from 1 repository, 14 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
20 samples harvested; 14 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 20 of the 20 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from ygan/NatSQL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
4afe995f7b1ddf57 · report
96702b7e3c7a6a21 · report
870f513d8cee4cab · report
9e81d6c0dbfbb852 · report
58c07f808a94f086 · report
c4dcaf29b663a364 · report
a2266df86cae8784 · report
b0825d653a089615 · report
4a745be5f30afaae · report
ef3dbdae33ca2c48 · report
0e25e2e0733db4c8 · report
48b57e02e3f2c83d · report
8833c58230d6386e · report
815b613db137fa80 · report
14ad4335d565ea1d · report
ec17bb9f6919d410 · report
afc0b5023361df91 · report
972a58657cfed15c · report
bfc0a46be80f851a · report
7a8b99916d022ef1 · report
Results from the paper
The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.10911, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections