Papers › Toward Efficient Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Only Low-Magnification...

Toward Efficient Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Only Low-Magnification Histopathological Images

12 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.10783added by Syntology

Dung Minh Do, Nhat-Thanh Huynh, Duc Minh Huynh, Doanh C. Bui, Khang Nguyen

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Whole-slide images (WSIs) provide rich tissue-level and cellular-level information, but storing and transmitting high-magnification pathology data is resource-intensive. Moreover, annotating WSIs at the pixel level is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether low-magnification pathology images with limited annotations (i.e., image-level instead of pixel-level labels) can achieve performance comparable to high-magnification images. This paper presents a systematic benchmark study on weakly supervised histopathological image segmentation under different low-resolution storage settings. Starting from high-resolution image patches, we simulate lower-magnification inputs and reconstruct them to the original size using interpolation and deep learning-based reconstruction methods before applying the weakly-supervised segmentation pipeline. This framework enables a quantitative evaluation of how weakly supervised methods respond to different levels of resolution degradation. Experimental results show that reconstruction quality metrics alone are insufficient to predict downstream segmentation performance. In particular, the study identifies a critical degradation point where the localization of small-scale structures declines significantly. These findings provide practical guidance for designing efficient digital pathology storage systems while maintaining reliable automated analysis. Code is available at https://github.com/Dung-Dx/LowMagWSS

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

13 samples harvested; 13 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 13 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Dung-Dx/LowMagWSS. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.10783, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections