Papers › Benchmark Evaluation of Federated Learning on Multi-organ Images

Benchmark Evaluation of Federated Learning on Multi-organ Images

9 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.08219added by Syntology

Junbin Mao, Xu Tian, Jianchun Zhu, Ludi Li, Jin Liu

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

The privacy requirements of medical data and its substantial variations across organs and modalities hinder the clinical implementation of medical AI. Federated learning (FL) is a feasible approach to overcome these challenges. Due to the continuous emergence of FL algorithms and the highly heterogeneous nature of medical data, objectively evaluating their performance in real-world clinical settings remains difficult. Therefore, a comprehensive federated medical imaging benchmark, serving as a unified evaluation standard, is crucial for advancing the technology toward reliable clinical application. Existing federated medical imaging benchmarks have not yet adequately incorporated state-of-the-art algorithms, are limited to data from single organs or modalities, and overly emphasize model accuracy, making it difficult to comprehensively assess the overall efficacy of FL in real-world medical environments. To address these challenges, we developed the MobenFL benchmark. This benchmark integrates 20 cutting-edge FL algorithms and 22 medical imaging datasets, covering 12 critical organs across the human body, surpassing existing benchmark in breadth. In terms of evaluation dimensions, MobenFL not only assesses performance but also systematically incorporates key metrics such as algorithmic efficiency and privacy protection capabilities. Additionally, it conducts specialized evaluations for complex real-world clinical scenarios involving different diseases, devices, and imaging modalities, thereby providing a comprehensive and in-depth evaluation framework for the clinical application of FL in the medical field.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 7 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 8 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from yutian0315/MobenFL. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.08219, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections