Papers › From Jumps to Signatures: a Generative Method for Temporal Point Processes

From Jumps to Signatures: a Generative Method for Temporal Point Processes

7 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.06652added by Syntology

Niels Cariou-Kotlarek, Vasileios Lampos

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Rough path signatures are a universal feature map for continuous paths and, via the expected signature, characterise path distributions. These guarantees do not directly extend to cadlag paths of Temporal Point Processes (TPPs), limiting the use of signature methods for event sequences. Furthermore, neural TPP models, including recent generative approaches, optimise per-event objectives with no global sequence-level loss, while evaluation of variable-length event sequences lacks distributional discrepancy measures. This paper proposes a common pathwise framework for addressing these limitations. We introduce the interarrival embedding, a stable, injective lift from jump paths to continuous paths of bounded variation, extending signature methods to discrete event sequences. Our theoretical contributions give rise to sigTPP, the first signature-based generative model for TPPs, trained using a path-level loss on complete trajectories. We further analyse the space of counting paths and derive three distributional discrepancies, providing mathematically justified tools for evaluating generative TPP models. Across synthetic and real-world datasets, sigTPP achieves the best average rank based on eight complementary metrics, outperforms or is within a standard error of the strongest baseline in 64% of the dataset-metric pairs, and according to a relative score, improves against every baseline by at least 19% on average.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

8 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from Code-Cornelius/sigtpp. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.06652, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections