Papers › AI for Cultural Heritage Textiles: Fine-Tuned Latent Diffusion for Novel Ulos Motif Synthesis

AI for Cultural Heritage Textiles: Fine-Tuned Latent Diffusion for Novel Ulos Motif Synthesis

6 Jul 2026arXiv:2607.06590added by Syntology

Humasak Tommy Argo Simanjuntak, Jesika Purba, Sitogab Girsang, Widya Manurung, Samuel Situmeang, Arlinta Barus, Daniel Oranova Siahaan

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Preserving and revitalising traditional textiles such as Ulos, a cultural heritage of the Batak ethnic group in North Sumatra, Indonesia, requires balancing fidelity to tradition with innovative approaches that meet contemporary design demands. Traditional Ulos weaving faces two key limitations: a narrow range of motifs and a time-intensive design process. This study presents a generative AI framework that fine-tunes two pretrained latent diffusion models: Protogen v3.4 and Stable Diffusion v1.4, on a curated, annotated dataset of high-resolution Ulos motifs to generate culturally consistent yet novel designs. Model performance is evaluated quantitatively using Frechet Inception Distance (FID), Inception Score (IS), and qualitatively through assessments by traditional weavers and members of the public. Protogen v3.4 consistently outperforms Stable Diffusion v1.4, achieving substantially lower FID (~10.5x) and higher IS (2.0x), indicating superior visual fidelity, diversity, and closer alignment with the real Ulos motif distribution. We further examine the effects of strength and guidance scale on generation quality across both models. Lower strength values consistently yield higher fidelity (lower FID), while higher strength values increase generative diversity at the cost of realism, revealing a clear fidelity-diversity tradeoff for both models. Across all tested configurations, a guidance scale of 5-9 provides the most effective balance between fidelity and diversity, stabilising FID, KID, and IS, and is recommended as the operating range for high-quality, diverse Ulos motif generation. These findings demonstrate that carefully fine-tuned generative AI can support the creative renewal of intangible cultural heritage while preserving its stylistic and symbolic integrity.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

13 samples harvested; 11 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from CompVis/latent-diffusion. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.06590, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections