Papers › Learning Biophysical Models of Large-Scale Multineuronal Data to Enable Precise...

Learning Biophysical Models of Large-Scale Multineuronal Data to Enable Precise Neurostimulation

5 Jul 2026ICMLarXiv:2607.04063added by Syntology

Amrith Lotlikar, Ian Christopher Tanoh, Praful Vasireddy, Andrew Lanpouthakoun, Ramandeep Vilkhu, Michael Sommeling, A. J. Phillips, Alexander Sher, Alan Litke, Scott W. Linderman, E. J. Chichilnisky, Subhasish Mitra

Title, abstract, authors and date from arXiv's metadata (CC0); this paper is not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen 2025-07-28).

Multi-compartment Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) models provide a principled framework for predicting neural dynamics and responses to electrical stimulation. However, fitting HH biophysical parameters typically requires intracellular recordings, which are invasive and low-throughput, limiting the ability to capture the geometry and cell-specific properties of many neurons in a given neural circuit. Multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) offer a scalable alternative - high-density extracellular measurements from full neural populations, but HH model complexity has so far precluded reliable biophysical inference from extracellular data alone. Here, we introduce a framework to rapidly infer HH parameters from designed features of extracellular MEA measurements by leveraging differentiable biophysical simulation and simulation-based inference, unlocking a wide range of downstream applications. In this work, we focus on a central goal of translational neuroengineering: predicting neural spiking responses to candidate neurostimulation patterns that would take hours to measure clinically. To validate our approach, we collected hundreds of hours of stimulation and recording data from isolated macaque retina with a 30 um-pitch 512-electrode array. Our framework predicted previously unseen multi-electrode stimulation responses with 90.6% accuracy using HH models fit from only a few minutes of recording, replacing hours of stimulus testing.

Code

Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

13 samples harvested; 11 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 13 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from amrith1/rgc-ei-fit-hh. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper

The Papers with Code archive ends with its 2025-07-28 snapshot. This paper's arXiv identifier, 2607.04063, was issued in July 2026, after that date, so the archive has no leaderboard rows for it.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections